Threat Range is a collaborative blue team simulation where players work together to detect, investigate, and respond to active cyber attacks in a live environment.
Participants are assigned different roles across SOC and Digital Forensics teams, each with their own responsibilities during the exercise. Success depends on communication, investigation quality, and how effectively the teams work together under pressure.
Joining an Event
To participate in a Threat Range event, you must first join your organisation on the CTF platform, and then you can check the upcoming events and find the Threat Range. Once you enter the event, you can choose one of the roles:
SOC L1/L2 Analyst
Digital Forensics (L3) Analyst
Your assigned role determines the tools, pages, and responsibilities available to you during the simulation.
Roles
SOC L1/L2 Analyst
As a SOC analyst, your primary responsibility is to monitor incoming alerts, investigate suspicious activity, and determine whether incidents should be escalated.
You will:
Review alerts generated throughout the exercise
Analyze logs and evidence
Determine the severity and impact of the activity
Escalate tickets requiring deeper investigation
Document findings and investigation notes
Your goal is to quickly identify real threats while minimizing unnecessary escalations.
Digital Forensics (L3) Analyst
As a Digital Forensics analyst, your role begins when a ticket is escalated to your backlog.
Using SIEM data, DFIR tooling, and endpoint access, you will:
Investigate escalated incidents in depth
Trace attacker behavior and movement
Analyze logs, telemetry, and forensic artifacts
Validate or de-escalate escalations when necessary
Determine the full scope and impact of incidents
Complete investigation questions and document findings
Your investigations help uncover the complete attack path and improve the team’s overall response effectiveness.
Threat Range is designed around teamwork between the SOC and Digital Forensics teams.
SOC analysts are responsible for identifying and escalating suspicious activity, while Digital Forensics continue the investigation and validate escalation decisions.
Clear communication and detailed handovers are critical to success. Strong collaboration allows teams to respond faster, reduce missed threats, and improve overall resilience during the event.
Alerts and Tickets
Throughout the exercise, alerts will continuously appear as attacker activity unfolds within the environment.
Alerts
Alerts represent suspicious or potentially malicious activity detected within the environment.
SOC analysts are responsible for:
Reviewing alert details
Investigating related evidence
Determining whether escalation is necessary
Creating tickets for incidents requiring further analysis
Alerts may vary in severity and complexity depending on the scenario.
You can assign alerts to yourself or other L1/L2 players using the button on the right side of each alert:
Once assigned you can open the alert and start triaging,
You will be tasked with filling notes, selecting TP/FP, and the impact.
Escalation is required for Medium, High, and Critical in case of True Positive.
Once you close the Alert you will see the scorecard for it, If escalated, scoring is delayed until the associated ticket is resolved by Digital Forensics.
Tickets
Tickets are created when incidents require additional investigation by the Digital Forensics team.
Tickets contain:
Investigation notes
Escalation details
Attached evidence and artifacts
Questions requiring resolution
As a Digital Forensics you can assign tickets to yourself from the backlog using the rightmost button and choosing your username:
Once a ticket is assigned, you can start investigating by following the notes and information left by the SOC L1/L2 players:
You will be tasked to answer all the questions based on your findings and decide whether the escalated alert warrants further action. If confirmed, provide supporting evidence and close the ticket with your analysis. If not, save time by de-escalating the ticket.
Once you take the decision and submit it you will see your Ticket score, more on scoring in the next section.
Network Discovery
The Network Discovery page provides centralized access to the infrastructure used throughout the simulation. It allows players to view hosts involved in the exercise, access investigation tooling, and perform endpoint or log-based analysis during ticket investigations.
The page also includes options to reset the range if issues occur during the simulation.
Access to hosts and tooling depends on the player’s assigned role:
SOC L1/L2 analysts have access to the SIEM and can view basic host information such as hostnames and IP addresses.
Digital Forensics (L3) analysts have additional host-level access, including SSH connectivity and EDR/DFIR tooling.
Each host contains:
VM Name – The underlying virtual machine identifier used internally or for direct access
Hostname – The name assigned within the simulated environment
IP Address – Used for SSH or internal network context
DFIR Access – A direct link to a DFIR-enabled instance for that host
SSH Access – Command and credentials for remote shell access
SIEM Access – For central log review
User Accounts – Multiple credential sets for simulating multi-user or multi-tenant environments
Access Methods
DFIR Instance
Each host includes a dedicated DFIR Instance button that opens an environment instrumented with endpoint telemetry and investigation tooling.
Tied to the specific VM
Supports memory, process and file system inspection
Preloaded with access to data relevant to the assigned scenario
SSH Access
Direct SSH access is available with the provided usernames and passwords.
May include multiple accounts per host
Allows hands-on inspection, log review and manual evidence collection
SIEM Access
Analysts can connect to the SIEM to review correlated alerts and raw logs from across the environment.
SIEM access is shared but scoped per simulation
Scoring and Performance
Ticket and Alert Score
Each investigation contributes to your team’s overall performance during the event.
Scoring is based on factors such as:
Accuracy of investigations
Correct escalation decisions
Number of correct answers
SLA compliance
Efficient handling of incidents improves the team’s Threat Resilience Index and overall ranking within the event.
Threat Resilience Index
The Threat Resilience Index measures how effectively your team responds to attacks during the simulation.
The score reflects:
Successful threat detection
Incident containment
Recovery effectiveness
Overall operational resilience
Teams that respond quickly and accurately will maintain a stronger resilience rating throughout the event.
Incident Report Submission
At the end of the simulation, teams are required to submit an Incident Report summarizing their investigation and overall understanding of the attack.
The Incident Report represents the final deliverable of the exercise and simulates the type of reporting produced by real-world SOC and Digital Forensics teams after an incident.
Any team member can submit the Incident Report. While the report is commonly led by Digital Forensics or L3 analysts, collaboration between all team members is strongly encouraged
Submitted reports are made available to administrators through the Analytics page for review and evaluation..















